Lady Gaga/VMA's/Music Industry = Satanism/Illuminati WTF ?

[[fray]RogerDodger]

Ivan Eht Nioj

[[Loli]coolmans]

Ivan Eht Nioj

dneirflriG ednolB a daH i hsiW I.

[Nome]

"i have 3 pennies, thats 3 cents"
"nope, this penny is just one cent, so this one, and the other one"

GOOD JOB, WE CAN DECONSTRUCT.

The Fame Monster itself has only minor occult themes and even less reason to apply masonic references in the videos and symbolics in performances. Regarding the Eye, no, just showing one eye is not, but to purposefully mask one eye and accentuate the other is another story...

lady g has people backing her up from behind the scenes, and to understand the whole picture, like i said earlier, you have to do better research than wikipedia and vigillantcitizen. There are a number of celebrities, and a number of amazing coincidences that happen, and seemingly pointless coverups *JFK*cough*

Otherwise, you're just counting your pennies seperately.

Nazi's were punished afterwards... the few cases that were made at the beginning were dropped quickly. If they had never lost, nobody would have been punished in the german legal system anyway.. Laws can, have been, and will be overwritten in a heartbeat. Its a piece of paper.

What's your next google skim read?

1. The occult themes are not minor. As you yourself pointed out, there is a preponderance of invocations of Baphomet, symbolism of sacrifice, and evil.
2. To purposefully mask one eye and accentuate the other? In what fashion? Lady Gaga accentuates both eyes just as much as she accentuates a single one. There is no basis for your claim.
3. I am very easily confused with the proper evidence. If you say there is much more, then reveal it--otherwise, leave this debate.
4. You confuse legality with diplomacy. What the Nazis did was nowhere near legal in international courts. The reason they were brushed off in the beginning was due to diplomacy, Post-WWI hesitation, and a collective fear of angering a powerful war machine.

[Strier]

1. The occult themes are not minor. As you yourself pointed out, there is a preponderance of invocations of Baphomet, symbolism of sacrifice, and evil.
2. To purposefully mask one eye and accentuate the other? In what fashion? Lady Gaga accentuates both eyes just as much as she accentuates a single one. There is no basis for your claim.
3. I am very easily confused with the proper evidence. If you say there is much more, then reveal it--otherwise, leave this debate.
4. You confuse legality with diplomacy. What the Nazis did was nowhere near legal in international courts. The reason they were brushed off in the beginning was due to diplomacy, Post-WWI hesitation, and a collective fear of angering a powerful war machine.

1. occult themes in her songs are minor indeed. As you yourself are pointing out, the ones in her videos are not.
2. nope.
3. read up on it yourself. I'm not here to convert people, nor to act as an argumentative atheist. I don't have a problem with another person's view.

I prefer to live my life knowing that there is a backbone to the way the world is, whether not not gaga is involved doesn't make a difference in that. Pop culture is riddled with interference and is aimed to generalize the population, and Lady GaGa is a strong prescence. The symbols in pop culture videos aren't for screaming the illumni's involvement, they are placed there by choice. Bickering over technicalities is so pointless because the fact remains is that they are there.

4.international law and country laws are not the discussion. That's equal to state/federal law and is not the point either. It's legal to smoke pot in amsterdam but not in sweden. big whoop.

So if you are going to learn anything form all this posting, please let it be that not everything in the world runs off of proof and evidence. as i've said before quite a few times there will never be solid proof of many things in the world, and many of the world's "truths" that we all hold dear are nothing but theory.

Some things cannot be proved without a shadow of doubt, and at the same time they cannot be disproved for the same reasons.

If nothing else you should read the above because all you are doing is starting up a "god doesn't exist" rehash.

[Nome]

1. occult themes in her songs are minor indeed. As you yourself are pointing out, the ones in her videos are not.
2. nope.
3. read up on it yourself. I'm not here to convert people, nor to act as an argumentative atheist. I don't have a problem with another person's view.

I prefer to live my life knowing that there is a backbone to the way the world is, whether not not gaga is involved doesn't make a difference in that. Pop culture is riddled with interference and is aimed to generalize the population, and Lady GaGa is a strong prescence. The symbols in pop culture videos aren't for screaming the illumni's involvement, they are placed there by choice. Bickering over technicalities is so pointless because the fact remains is that they are there.

4.international law and country laws are not the discussion. That's equal to state/federal law and is not the point either. It's legal to smoke pot in amsterdam but not in sweden. big whoop.

So if you are going to learn anything form all this posting, please let it be that not everything in the world runs off of proof and evidence. as i've said before quite a few times there will never be solid proof of many things in the world, and many of the world's "truths" that we all hold dear are nothing but theory.

Some things cannot be proved without a shadow of doubt, and at the same time they cannot be disproved for the same reasons.

If nothing else you should read the above because all you are doing is starting up a "god doesn't exist" rehash.

I'm asking you to provide any solid evidence and you refuse to, instead telling me to look for it myself. I looked--I couldn't find any. So I'm asking you to. The more you evade, the less your argument's integrity.

[Kowz]

[LolMaliken]

tbh? skimmed this thread for illuminati (dissapointingly low references to nicholas cage) penis cents and compasses. lol@obama pic though

[Strier]

I'm asking you to provide any solid evidence and you refuse to, instead telling me to look for it myself. I looked--I couldn't find any. So I'm asking you to. The more you evade, the less your argument's integrity.

Your whole point is tits or gtfo. My point is that doesn't make anything more valid or less valid.

As for "solid evidence" there are many testimonials and less flamboyant articles on the illuminati. As i've been telling you for the last umpteen pages, it is a belief, and like i just posted, and you apparently didn't see

So if you are going to learn anything form all this posting, please let it be that not everything in the world runs off of proof and evidence. as i've said before quite a few times there will never be solid proof of many things in the world, and many of the world's "truths" that we all hold dear are nothing but theory.

Some things cannot be proved without a shadow of doubt, and at the same time they cannot be disproved for the same reasons.

If nothing else you should read the above because all you are doing is starting up a "god doesn't exist" rehash.

That is the moral to the illuminati story, and the redundancy of trying to argue against it.



Interest in the gaga theory comes after interest in the illuminati theory, and is all up for individual comprehension.




FUNNILY ENOUGH, that obama picture sums it all up in an exaggerated sense. With the exception of obama's obviously prosthetic arm, everything is a matter of perception. Prove everything right? Prove everything wrong?

You can't.