You would need at least 3 different games, not 3 from one. What are the chances you would get the same group of friends in 3 different games on the same day. I don't delieve match making has that kind of flaw in it. Also I don't believe I have ever been reported or been threatened to be reported for having a bad game or two. It is pretty obvious when someone is just having an off game and I would hope that most players don't currently submit tickets under RAP for this.
Additionally, if 50% of tickets are getting marked innocent, that means 50% of the people using the system can't even be bothered to read the rules or construct a decent report. These are the people you want to give the power to ban people without explanation?
Or do you honestly think that the 50% marked innocent do not include false negatives?
Last edited by Drauis; 08-05-2012 at 11:57 PM.
Well I really hope you take the concept on board at least. By S2 giving players even a limited amount of self-governance would go a long way in reducing a lot of anger and frustration from trolls. It's not fair on GM's to be dealing with the same issues over and over when they are limited to what they can/cannot do to help.
Really a win, win all around. Less RAP tickets for GM's lead to more quality decisions through RAP and more time for those who are also players to get a few more games in.
I'm sure there is may be room for improvement in the idea of player initiated banning, and would have liked to see more people post suggestions.