SUPPORT ACCOUNT CLANS
Welcome, Unregistered.
 

Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread. Thread: EHP Comparision: Sacrificial Stone v2.6.8

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1.   Click here to go to the next staff post in this thread.   #1
    Offline
    S2 Staff Member S2 Games Staff
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    9,763

    EHP Comparision: Sacrificial Stone v2.6.8

    Item Summary

    Old:
    5050 gold
    450 hp + 25 hp per charge
    6 hp/sec + .25 hp/sec per charge

    New:
    1938 gold
    114 hp + 57 hp if charged
    8.84 armor + 0.42 armor if charged
    0.27 hp/sec + 0.09 hp/sec if charged

    Assumptions

    -Health regen over 10 seconds, so 6 hp/sec regen considered as 60 pure hp for calculation purposes
    -(K+A)/D = 3.0, which gives an average sustained level of three sac stone charges
    -New Sac stone will be charged 75% of the time (3 kills or assists per death)

    EHP Formula

    Additional EHP = H +.06*H*a + 0.06*h*A + 0.06*H*A

    where,
    H = health of item
    A = armor of item
    h = health prior to purchase
    a = armor prior to puchase

    Parameters

    (Based On Assumptions Above)
    Old = 592.5 hp, 0 armor, 5050 gold
    New = 160.1 hp, 9.2 armor, 1938 gold

    Graphs

    Pure EHP (not factoring in gold cost):

    EHP per 100 gold:

    Results

    -Sac Stone provides more EHP now for most situations than it did prior to the rework
    -For most situations, new Sac Stone is over three times as efficient for EHP per gold

    Honorable Mentions

    -New Sac stone also provides armor for nearby allies
    -Old Sac stone had far superior mana regeneration

    Fun Math Fact

    -Assume a modest 1500 health and 10 armor prior to purchase
    -Old Sac Stone would need 11 charges to equal the EHP as new Sac Stone
    -Old Sac Stone would need 58 charges to equal the EHP per Gold as new Sac Stone

    S2 Games: Dedicated employees serving dedicated gamers. Continuous development. Never-ending improvement.
    -----------------------------



  2. #2
    Offline
    Account Icon
    Chat Symbol
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    7,389
    Nicely done , really shows that the rework is a lot better than people think.
    Casual HoN

  3. #3
    Offline
    Account Icon
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    On every subforum
    Posts
    3,125
    Yea, people who yell at me for picking it up deserve this link. Its really powerful despite its shared cooldown activateable.

    Can you do a comparison with Icon versus the major HP items such as Helm? I'm curious to see if its viable without the max HP increase that it no longer has.
    The sign of lost Carcosa appeared in the air, paralyzing us with dread older than the very idea of time.
    As we looked on in horror, the unholy sign dissolved into a lone figure, shrouded in yellow.

  4. #4
    I think it was pretty clear that old sac stone was bad, so I'd rather see a comparison of the new sac stone to other survivability items.

  5.   This is the last staff post in this thread.   #5
    Offline
    S2 Staff Member S2 Games Staff
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    9,763
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkstar_X View Post
    I think it was pretty clear that old sac stone was bad, so I'd rather see a comparison of the new sac stone to other survivability items.
    Assume:
    1500 HP, 10 Armor
    Enemy heroes hit you for 150 damage on average
    5 second fight duration
    75% upkeep on Sac charge

    Sac Stone + Iron Buckler = 2188 gold = 1270 EHP
    HotBL = 2225 gold = 828 EHP

    I'll have more on Sac Stone vs HotBL early next week, but Sac Stone + Buckler destroys HotBL when it comes to survival against heroes. Only downside is extra slot.
    (HotBL wins against creeps, since each attack only takes 1 charge from HotBL)

    S2 Games: Dedicated employees serving dedicated gamers. Continuous development. Never-ending improvement.
    -----------------------------



  6. #6
    That's pretty awesome

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkstar_X View Post
    I think it was pretty clear that old sac stone was bad, so I'd rather see a comparison of the new sac stone to other survivability items.

    2 of my fav heroes are Doc and SR and it was a great item on both those guys and was very good on other heroes. Trying to force it to work on heroes it isn't meant for might have been your problem?

    Personally I am gutted they remade it because of how OP it was on Doc in mid wars.

  8. #8
    This just in: armour is better than HP after a certain point for providing EHP.
    I'm judged by my wild image a lot
    And everybody seems to think I have a sinister plot
    I do! Be offended by every sentence I jot
    I got some militant thoughts, and you ain't killin' 'em off!
    So listen...

  9. #9
    Offline
    Account Icon
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,908
    Old Sac Stone did not just provide EHP though, it had several other benefits going for it.

    Forum Moderators are not S2 Games employees. My posts in no way represent the view of S2 Games or any of its staff.

    Please use the report post function to have me review a post that you believe is breaking the Forum Rules.
    Check the Sticky Threads for additional information on this sub-forum and the Announcement Threads for more information about Heroes of Newerth as a whole!

    -----------------------------

    "What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist.”

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •