Hey I haven't played this game a lot, maybe around 150 or 200 games now.
I mainly played 3vs3 with friends but sometimes with Random people.
Now heres my complaint or change demand: 3vs3 is a game with 6 players, There could be 2 premade in one team and I have already had it that when my team is winning the 2 other teammates kicked me because they wanted to finish the game 2 vs 3, seeing as we already won. I didn't get a win, I got nothing ! This happened 3 times now.
Another one is the Remake vote, it needs 4 votes, I was bot with a friend and someone Random top: I ganked top and got 3 kills but my Random Teammate started complaining that I took too many kills, he voted a Remake and ofcourse the other team accepted because they had lost Bloodlust and 3 kills ...
So better remove the Remake button after Bloodlust and the Kick button after destroying one of their base towers or barracks. You cannot trust the players all the premades of 2 people they just kick the Random player so they can 2 vs 3 the enemies without having to worry about communicating with the Random player.
The worst thing is that this has happened to me around 15 - 20 times. Even worse: I didn't get anything after a game of 25 minutes, having most kills, carrying the team and then getting kicked because they were able to finish it 2 vs 3.
Now lets see what serious people respond to this.
What serious people are going to say is:
Wrong forum Section. Try GD och Suggestions.
As this is a suggestion moreso than mechanics, I'll try to explain the reasoning as mechanically as I can. =)
What it comes down to is simply: With 6 total players the vote options are limited.
The voted on player cannot get a vote (obviously he will not kick himself). This leaves 5 votes total for a unanimous decision, two of which on your own team. If you are solo-queue, the chances are very high that your team will be filled out by a two-man group. They are likely to vote together. This is an unavoidable situation. Fortunately when a player is kicked they still receive +MMR if their team goes on to win without them and a leave is not added to their record.
The options are 3/3, 4/6, 5/6, or 6/6. 3 of 6 is unreasonable because a single team could control the entire vote. 6 of 6 is unreasonable because a single player could hold the other 5 hostage. 5 of 6 was decided against because once again the 2-man team is very common, and this would allow two friends to grief together and block the vote. For a 4 of 6 remake to pass unreasonably somebody on the winning team must agree that the match is not worth playing.
Which is more likely?
A lone player wanting to remake during a match they are winning in?
A team of two F2P trolls who grief together and prevent remakes to hold the other 4 players hostage?
It was ultimately decided that the latter is more problematic and more common, which is why a 4 of 6 vote for remake was decided on.
Closing. If you have suggestions for improving the system please utilize the suggestions forum.
S2 Games: Dedicated employees serving dedicated gamers. Continuous development. Never-ending improvement.