As usual, RAP has failed to punish an obvious griefer. I was just told that my report was in a 'grey' zone and therefore the offender was merely warned. In the replay, you can clearly see the player in question DESTROY a rune. He didn't just pick it up for himself instead of letting me bottle it (which should also be considered griefing but I digress). He killed it right in front of me making sure to wait until after I had used all my bottle charges. Not only did the player I'm referring to intentionally kill a rune just to grief, but he also admitted in chat that he was disgruntled due to feeding his lane several kills minutes earlier. RAP banned me only weeks ago for killing a friendly item which I thought was an enemy bound eye, yet can't ban a player who intentionally attacks a rune multiple times. I can't say I'm surprised.
Match ID is 92334113
Last edited by Donquavius; 06-12-2012 at 02:43 PM.
You should make your post clear.
Also, why don't you just appeal this "grey" zone ticket ?
Thread about Appealing Tickets:
Last edited by StateOfArt; 06-12-2012 at 02:42 PM.
Just by saying he killed a rune is enough. You don't need to mention how many times he attacked it.
Also, I edited my post and right after that I saw your answer.
*EDIT* Please delete the Match ID Number. It is against the forum rules.
Quote from the Rules:
RAP Feedback Forum Rules
DO NOT POST SPECIFIC MATCH NUMBERS OR PLAYER NAMES IN THIS FORUM
Last edited by StateOfArt; 06-12-2012 at 02:46 PM.
In 2 of my previous posts, I already gave you the link in order to appeal this grey zone ticket and told you that match IDs are not allowed.
If a GM answers to your thread he will just close the thread and say to you that you should appeal it if you think that it's wrong.
Per this thread under item destruction, destroying a tablet/powerup is never against the Rules of Conduct.
However I personally disagree with this one, as tablets can be as valuable as any other item. I'll bring this up with Feanux and we'll discuss a possible rule change. If we decide to enable it I will personally review your ticket and retroactively reverse it for inspiring the change.
From what I'm understanding here, the player in question only killed 1 rune and was hence warned for it. Most likely the player had no previous bans and for such a... minor offense was only given a warning. Not sure why such a huge fuss has been made over this thread.
Check out this suggestion for Puppet Master's alt avatar: Doll Master => http://forums.heroesofnewerth.com/sh...ll-Only-Avatar
There are times that destroying a rune is fine. If I see a rune, such as regen or invis, that will not help any myself teammate nearby or myself, I feel it's best to destroy it to not give the other team the opportunity to make use of it.