|
|
Yes we need a 5th ban
No, 4 bans is enough
I see no problem with a 6th or 7th ban either.
Need more souls.. !
or a 8th and 9th ban...
MoonMeander: Sometimes when I get bored at night I pretend I'm Chtuluphant and charge my girlfriend, pillow, blanket off the bed and yell "MRRHHHHHHHHHH!"
Parakletos: two kinds of people in the world: people who jump on their **** in the shower and dirty liers
Fantasy: You definitely are a GIANT contributer that I am, where I am.
NovyPirat: The only thing riser needs to survive is the island and the others
www.TWITTER.com/zeNapFTW
www.YOUTUBE.com/zeNapFTW
this will unfortunately never happen, but changes are coming
electrician
i think this is a good idea.
I really, really want more bans.
It means more diverse, interesting (and viable!) lineups.
Need more souls.. !
Tempest, Plague Rider, Dsham, Glacius, Magmus, Pebbles, Jereziah, and of course Torturer are all picked early or banned in almost every single game (at least 8 out of the 18 heroes in a draft are pretty much guaranteed to be from Dota). Valkyrie has been very popular for a long time, and against many teams Ophelia is usually banned or picked as well, so all the s2 heroes being OP compared to the classics is pretty obviously not true.
Not saying that balance on all the s2 heroes is perfect (pretty much all of them start out either OP or terrible, and then need to be adjusted), and there are plenty of balance issues left to be worked out, but today I finally snapped and couldn't take all of the "s2 hero = OP, dota hero = just fine" anymore.
More like S2 heroes are annoying as hell to play with or against, not just that they are OP. And by S2 heroes people tend to mean those that came after retail or even after 2.0, such asand not the older ones like
.
For example I'd much rather play against the un-nerfed version of torturer than Cthuluphant, probaply just me though.