People having opinions about a subjective topic? Quick, I must tell them they are wrong.
To me, if you hear just good things about a player and read overall that he's THAT GREAT KID, but when you see him, he does medicore and gets carried, then yes, in your eyes, by your opinion, he is overrated. If there is a guy who's quiet in the forums, does good in games overall, but doesn't have that "HERE I AM"-attitude, he's probably an underrated players.
So your first statement is to make it seem like I don't understand that this thread is opinion based when I clearly said, " People are being way too subjective for a subjective topic." You should try and grasp the English language better before you try to refute what I say when instead you stated something that was known already.
Secondly, you're not mentioning anything new to what I said with the second portion. That case obviously applies but there's a difference when a FEW people say someone is great and is thus considered an overrated player as opposed to when a COMMUNITY says that someone is great but doesn't play up to par. What I'm saying is that instead of people going by hearsay and trying to estimate how many people think of a player a certain way, they should use a statistic, such as the Honcast Community Awards to base their opinion off of. There's no point to base an opinion off of something you're unsure of. It makes that opinion worthless. That was the entire point of my post and that is why I linked that thread.
I don't understand why people think n0tail and Slickz are underrated... They're considered the best in the game at specific things. How can you say the people that are widely considered the best there is to be underrated?