SUPPORT ACCOUNT CLANS
Welcome, Unregistered.
 

Thread: Is Atheism Super Natural

Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 124
  1. #1

    Is Atheism Super Natural

    Even Atheism is missing some key parts.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0DT6uljSbg

  2. #2
    Offline
    Account Icon
    Chat Symbol
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    2,093
    Christ, give it a rest already people.


    SPACESAVAGE I'm summoning you~

    Thanks for the sig Lhune <3
    Check out My blog in which i post chapters of my novel every so often http://lightvoid.wordpress.com/

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Blueflash View Post
    Christ, give it a rest already people.


    SPACESAVAGE I'm summoning you~
    I don't personally care for politics or celebrities but I really love to have a good debate. Religion is always a very good debate as long as people don't go beserk at everything you say.

  4. #4
    inb4 lock

    although i will say cause and effect isnt an actual law. particles have been found to spontaneously be generated in open space. something can indeed come from nothing.

    and i dont think that god is impossible on this basis. he has enough other flaws that this is meaningless.
    Last edited by LegoPirate; 02-28-2012 at 02:55 PM.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by LegoPirate View Post
    inb4 lock

    although i will say cause and effect isnt an actual law. particles have been found to spontaneously be generated in open space. something can indeed come from nothing.

    and i dont think that god is impossible on this basis. he has enough other flaws that this is meaningless.
    This sounds like a big loss for atheism. Until scientist can figure out a logical reason why something can come from nothing they are at ground zero. Right next to religion of course.

  6. #6
    Religion can't claim something to be supernatural either without treading on logically shaky ground since the god/gods in question must ultimately be part of a framework within which possibility reigns and outside impossibility reigns, making it only a matter of defining that which is inside as natural. Which by now must include what would normally be called supernatural.
    While i guess you could argue that the framework is not necessarily static i cannot see how it could be so.

  7. #7
    Offline
    Account Icon
    Chat Symbol
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    2,784
    Troll thread.
    __________________

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanybag View Post
    Troll thread.
    __________________
    Thanks for stopping by. You helped develop the foundations for a good discussion.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by KingSaber View Post
    This sounds like a big loss for atheism. Until scientist can figure out a logical reason why something can come from nothing they are at ground zero. Right next to religion of course.
    any smart atheist/agnostic will say the burden of proof lies squarely with religion.

    i dont need to say why something comes from nothing, only that it does. the why is something that is created by human intelligence (or lack thereof)

    they are the ones making the claim of god, thus they are required to support that claim. since they have no evidence for god (no real evidence) then at the very least the logical position would be agnosticism. some of the more militant folks go for full on atheism.

  10. #10
    I believe there have been repeated attempts at generating discussion on the topic, all of which eventually degrade into passive-aggressive insults and mudslinging.

    It's just way too much of a touchy subject.
    The John Smith who will shake the world.

  11. #11
    Offline
    Account Icon
    Chat Symbol
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    2,784
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyonko View Post
    I believe there have been repeated attempts at generating discussion on the topic, all of which eventually degrade into passive-aggressive insults and mudslinging.

    It's just way too much of a touchy subject.
    That's not why I called this a troll thread.

    This is a troll thread because the troll (OP) created a false position of atheism (a straw man, if you will), attacked it, and then claimed that this somehow strengthens the position of religion. It's an old sack of bullshit that has been beaten to death. Honestly, I'm just tired of getting **** spewed everywhere.

    This thread will ultimately lead to a religious discussion thread and if we've learned anything (and I hope we have), then this thread is destined to go nowhere. And least nowhere reasonable.
    __________________

  12. #12
    Personally, I think it's a little sad that we can't even mention religion without a bunch of people whistle blowing, instantly asking for a thread lock, or whining to the moderators.

    If it's that touchy of a subject then it needs to be discussed. Rational, healthy people can discuss any topic without getting angry or defensive. Getting angry and defensive is a sign that you aren't comfortable with your own belief systems, so when other people challenge it, it upsets you.

    What happens when nobody challenges people like this? You get the United States of America. So go ahead mods, lock the thread. Keep contributing to the problem I implore you.
    Last edited by Hat_Truck; 02-28-2012 at 03:49 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by senzation54
    I don't care which Christian branch you belong to, unless you belong to one that acknowledges that the entire friggin Bible is a fairy tale that was written by a bunch of different idiots and then voted by a congress on which gospels and crap were actually worthy of being in the Bible, you're an idiot. You're a person who doesn't think for himself and clings to the stupid beliefs his parents forced on him as a child, or you're the even worse kind of idiot who actually started believing this crap as an adult. Either way you're an idiot.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyonko View Post
    I believe there have been repeated attempts at generating discussion on the topic, all of which eventually degrade into passive-aggressive insults and mudslinging.

    It's just way too much of a touchy subject.
    I find this amusing in a way. I believe in the existence of a god but I don't get angry when I listen to someone else's beliefs. I find people who do to be very ignorant and closed minded.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanybag View Post
    This thread will ultimately lead to a religious discussion thread and if we've learned anything (and I hope we have), then this thread is destined to go nowhere. And least nowhere reasonable.
    I see what you did there.
    The John Smith who will shake the world.

  15. #15
    Offline
    Account Icon
    Chat Symbol
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Saint Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    3,028
    Since when have atheists use "the law of cause and effect" to disprove God?

    Anyway nobodies sure yet how the universe came into existence, although some physicists have ideas, however they are not by any means proven.
    A Universe From Nothing
    Curiosity with Stephen Hawking, Did God Create the Universe?

    Quote Originally Posted by KingSaber View Post
    I find this amusing in a way. I believe in the existence of a god but I don't get angry when I listen to someone else's beliefs. I find people who do to be very ignorant and closed minded.
    Do you believe in a personal god? If so which one and why?

    inb4 quantum physics debate
    [Map

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by KingSaber View Post
    Even Atheism is missing some key parts.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0DT6uljSbg
    Okay, to address that video.

    First of all, atheism is not a belief system. Someone made the analogy that atheism is to a belief system as "off" is to a T.V. Channel.

    Atheism is a lack of belief in theism (usually noted as a lack of belief in a God).

    However, a lack of a belief in supernatural theologies, does not necessarily mean a firm belief in Science, nature, math, or any particular school of thought.

    Therefore, your (and the video's) premise is fundamentally flawed: Just because you're an atheist, it doesn't mean you automatically believe in The Big Bang Theory.

    However, even if you did believe in the The Big Bang Theory, it doesn't mean you have to explain every single detail about it and the beginnings of the Universe for it to be valid.

    For example, before we knew what the Sun was or where it came from, we could very clearly look into the sky during the day and see that there was a bright orange ball of light. Even if some theists at the time may have wanted to deny that there was a big bright orange ball of light, it did not change the fact that the Sun was there.

    Similarly, on the topics of The Big Bang Theory, Evolution, etc., just because we don't completely understand every detail, does not mean that what we can see and prove with overwhelming empirical evidence has no value. To say that it has no value would be a logical fallacy.

    tl;dr - You don't have to know every single detail about an event or occurrence to know that it happened.
    Last edited by Hat_Truck; 02-28-2012 at 04:16 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by senzation54
    I don't care which Christian branch you belong to, unless you belong to one that acknowledges that the entire friggin Bible is a fairy tale that was written by a bunch of different idiots and then voted by a congress on which gospels and crap were actually worthy of being in the Bible, you're an idiot. You're a person who doesn't think for himself and clings to the stupid beliefs his parents forced on him as a child, or you're the even worse kind of idiot who actually started believing this crap as an adult. Either way you're an idiot.

  17. #17
    Offline
    Account Icon
    Chat Symbol
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    2,093
    Quote Originally Posted by Hat_Truck View Post
    Personally, I think it's a little sad that we can't even mention religion without a bunch of people whistle blowing, instantly asking for a thread lock, or whining to the moderators.

    If it's that touchy of a subject then it needs to be discussed. Rational, healthy people can discuss any topic without getting angry or defensive. Getting angry and defensive is a sign that you aren't comfortable with your own belief systems, so when other people challenge it, it upsets you.

    What happens when nobody challenges people like this? You get the United States of America. So go ahead mods, lock the thread. Keep contributing to the problem I implore you.
    I'm tired of flame fests up in here which are started by you making a religion thread once a week and some tard that doesnt know better than to ignore if he doesnt agree comes in and it turns into an all out back and forth. Topic isn't new, topic isn't meant for teh internet, Your views are yours, keep them to yourself for ****'s sake, that's all i'm asking.

    P.s: USA is a joke i agree, but not all of us are unfortunate enough to be stuck in that piss-soaked septic tank that insults the world by calling itself a free nation. "Land of the free" my virgin butthole.
    Last edited by Blueflash; 02-28-2012 at 04:33 PM.

    Thanks for the sig Lhune <3
    Check out My blog in which i post chapters of my novel every so often http://lightvoid.wordpress.com/

  18. #18
    to be fair, he didnt start this one.

    like flies to the light tho.

  19. #19
    Offline
    Account Icon
    Chat Symbol
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    2,093
    Quote Originally Posted by LegoPirate View Post
    to be fair, he didnt start this one.

    like flies to the light tho.
    Hence why i called for an early lock, but as always, no one listens to the one rational guy.

    Thanks for the sig Lhune <3
    Check out My blog in which i post chapters of my novel every so often http://lightvoid.wordpress.com/

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Hat_Truck View Post
    Okay, to address that video.

    First of all, atheism is not a belief system. Someone made the analogy that atheism is to a belief system as "off" is to a T.V. Channel.
    Wait, I always thought that atheism was the specific belief that there wasn't a god.

    Like, actively against the idea of a god.
    The John Smith who will shake the world.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •