|
|
Check the story on msnbc.com. Is this what really happened at S2?
wat1
Text-only sigs are terrible![]()
Never trust the NY Times. They make me angry
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43488005...ew_york_times/
what
Du sitzt im Renault Twingo,
was kuckst du mich an lan que pasa gringo
Doubtful, but still very interesting. I'm sure if this were the case, S2 would just admit that the FBI ran off with their stuff.
ATRANOX
JACKPOT.
Riot paid off the corrupt Feds to seize the HoN servers, you heard it here first.![]()
yes yes
Du sitzt im Renault Twingo,
was kuckst du mich an lan que pasa gringo
Love how this was moved to off-topic by the trigger-happy mods who are so very eager to write this off as being completely unrelated to the current downtime.
I believe we've found what is wrong. We need someone on the inside to infiltrate the FBI Headquarters and fix this mess.
I fail to see how this is off topic. It is a national news story related to a hacker group that attacked s2. Really mods?
Keep reposting in GD. This is a totally legit story.
The author of this thread doesn't provide a link to the article he wants to talk about, and the thread is full of empty one-liners. Truly a failed thread, with no effort put in by anybody to encourage it to greatness.
And not only does he put 0 effort into his thread, but there are already several other threads on Lulzsec he could've posted in.
If it were up to me, I wouldn't move the thread at all - I'd close it in GD for being off-topic, and close it in OT for being on-topic.I fail to see how this is off topic. It is a national news story related to a hacker group that attacked s2. Really mods?
That way, the author has less motivation to continuously churn out poor quality threads that drain the life from the forum.
Last edited by MichaelBurge; 06-21-2011 at 10:14 PM.
How would this be related to S2 ? Did you even read the article ? Did you notice the name of the provider, now find out if they were hosting S2's servers then you can make speculations...sigh
This is not only speculative, but also utterly insubstantiated. I don't think there's much to discuss.
Credit to Devious`, with thanks to AvunaOs for my last signature