[Suggestions] Buyback items, show veto'er

[BlacRyu]

1. Item Buyback
Currently when you buy items, you have a 15 second window to sell them back at the full price if you accidentally bought the wrong thing. It would be nice if a similar system were added for selling items, where if you accidentally sell the wrong item, you can buy it back from the shop within 15 seconds at half the price (the same amount you sold it for). It might be nice to add in a special buyback area to the shop as well so you don't have to go hunting for the item in the shops, though I'm not sure if this is really needed.

2. Unmask the Veto'er
Currently you can see who has voted and who hasn't in the f10 menu. There is a little green thumbs up next to those who have voted. It would be nice though to know who has veto'd a vote (voted no). If it could either show votes in the f10 menu for at least 15 seconds after a vote ends, or if it could display the name of the person who voted no when it announces that the vote failed, then when someone is doing something such as intentionally feeding and the votekick keeps failing we would know why.

[hackman5000]

I agree on both counts. The problem is when you have a team of people who instantly give up if they are 0-2, you get a cryfest thrown at you if you believe your team can still win the game. Then they talk trash to you while hitting concede every 10 seconds from 15m to the end.

Though this would be nice as you said to see if the person feeding is hitting no so they can continue feeding, or if the other team is hitting no to a kick or remake vote (it almost always is the other team, because they would rather feed their stats off your bad players than empathize with your 4v5 team).

[BlacRyu]

I agree on both counts. The problem is when you have a team of people who instantly give up if they are 0-2, you get a cryfest thrown at you if you believe your team can still win the game. Then they talk trash to you while hitting concede every 10 seconds from 15m to the end.

Though this would be nice as you said to see if the person feeding is hitting no so they can continue feeding, or if the other team is hitting no to a kick or remake vote (it almost always is the other team, because they would rather feed their stats off your bad players than empathize with your 4v5 team).
Yeah, it's a good way to fill your banlist up quickly.

[Volshok]

Agreed on both accounts.

[Slayn]

agree
an ingame info would be nice, like in dota, so you dont have to press f10, hehe

[spudwinkle]

two great ideas.
+1 agree.

[BlacRyu]

bump

[Lostj]

Agree on both ideas too.

Btw, I discovered the "sellback" functionality by accident today. I had bought a staff (+25 int) for madman by accident. I were so happy when I saw the whole money back :D

[BlacRyu]

Agree on both ideas too.

Btw, I discovered the "sellback" functionality by accident today. I had bought a staff (+25 int) for madman by accident. I were so happy when I saw the whole money back :D
Yeah it's pretty useful, like when I start a game and buy a bottle, then see that 2 of my teammates also have them.

[Dick_Assman]

I thought Id bring this up here:

The kick-function is mainly for players to get rid of a player on their own team who is either a dead weight, bug-abuser, feeder or a person who is just obnoxious. Why on earth does the opposing team have a say in weather, in many cases, the person who is the reason they might be winning the match, stays or goes?

Its beyond logic that the other team, or even 1 person, can decide if they want to keep a feeder on the opposing team or not.

[OpT1mUs]

+1 on all accounts.

[T_T]

A bit off topic, but a game happened to be 5v4 after ~20 minutes and I was already 4-0-1 when this person disconnected, and a vote for RM was called and I voted no. Someone on my team was friends with the other team (auto balance) asked who voted no, and I stepped up and said it was myself because it's around ~20 minutes in and I wanted to continue playing.

That being said, as soon as I let it known that it was me who voted no, the guy on my team voted to kick me so that they could RM without my vote.

I think keeping it anonymous has both it's pros and cons. I wouldn't mind either, but after that experience (I got a loss/leaver for being kicked...) I would prefer to have it anonymous.

[Sai]

A bit off topic, but a game happened to be 5v4 after ~20 minutes and I was already 4-0-1 when this person disconnected, and a vote for RM was called and I voted no. Someone on my team was friends with the other team (auto balance) asked who voted no, and I stepped up and said it was myself because it's around ~20 minutes in and I wanted to continue playing.

That being said, as soon as I let it known that it was me who voted no, the guy on my team voted to kick me so that they could RM without my vote.

I think keeping it anonymous has both it's pros and cons. I wouldn't mind either, but after that experience (I got a loss/leaver for being kicked...) I would prefer to have it anonymous.

You don't get disconnects from being kicked.

[Tr1cKSt3R]

!Agree

ommggg one time i was bb and was trying to figure out how to split my pers.. sold it on accident. for some reason i didn't even get gold for selling it.
lost the game cuz of that.

[Vanilla]

Good ideas

[ToxicHobo]

MY NAME IS TOXICHOBO AND I ENDORSE THIs MESSAGE

[Valk]

You don't get disconnects from being kicked.
Yes you do.

[Ayestes]

getting kicked should likely not count as a leave, simply to avoid the abuse with people kicking feeders or newbies - no need to ostracize a new player that horrifically

[BlacRyu]

A bit off topic, but a game happened to be 5v4 after ~20 minutes and I was already 4-0-1 when this person disconnected, and a vote for RM was called and I voted no. Someone on my team was friends with the other team (auto balance) asked who voted no, and I stepped up and said it was myself because it's around ~20 minutes in and I wanted to continue playing.

That being said, as soon as I let it known that it was me who voted no, the guy on my team voted to kick me so that they could RM without my vote.

I think keeping it anonymous has both it's pros and cons. I wouldn't mind either, but after that experience (I got a loss/leaver for being kicked...) I would prefer to have it anonymous.
You can already see who votes yes/no in the F10 menu, it just disappears immediately after the vote. I'm simply suggesting that it lets you check 10-15 seconds after a vote ends for convenience, unless another vote starts in that time. Or perhaps they could also add a 15 second waiting time between votes to avoid vote spamming.

[Dragonite]

I RE:agree maybe a list at top right of screen for 5 seconds after vote with names and thumbs